Optimized boat weight by real-time data acquisition Optimized boat weight by real-time data acquisition | HBM

Real-Time Data Acquisition and Control System Helps Boat Builder Keep Hull Weight and Thickness on Track

In the highly competitive leisure boat market, consistently delivering products that adhere closely to their published specs is critical from both customer satisfaction and manufacturing costs perspectives. One of the most important specs is the boat’s weight. It’s also important that the weight be distributed properly to avoid creating structural deficiencies. At Brunswick Boat Group’s Advanced Composites organization, engineers are developing and refining data acquisition and control tools designed to give the workers responsible for spraying fiberglass hulls and other parts the constant feedback they need to avoid adding unnecessary weight to the finished boat, and to ensure each area receives the thickness of fiberglass intended.

The fiberglass boat hull

To grasp the Material Monitoring System (MMS) for data acquisition and control that Sea Ray’s engineering team developed, it’s first necessary to understand the process the company uses to create a fiberglass boat hull or other fiberglass part. Parts are formed using a female mold; for Sea Ray’s largest yachts, this mold can be up to 60 feet long, 16 feet wide, and 10 feet deep; a finished yacht hull should weigh 14,000 pounds. The first step in the process is applying a thin layer of mold release compound by hand, which allows pulling the completed hull out of the mold like an ice cube out of a tray. A worker sprays a pigmented resin gel coat inside the mold, which gives the hull its slick surface, deep color and high gloss.

The next, and most critical, step is to apply the correct amount of “chop spray” to the part in precise layers. A chopper gun chops fiberglass filaments from a spool into sprayable pieces from 10 to 40 millimeters in length, then combines them with a thermosetting vinyl ester or polyester resin for application to the gel coat. However, without concrete feedback on the amounts of fiberglass and resin being consumed for each area, the quality of the chop spraying process depended in part on an individual worker’s ability to gauge the level of material being applied visually. This made it difficult to ensure that each section of the hull received the exact amount of fiberglass intended for it. Over-spraying not only added to the weight of the hull, but wasted fiberglass and resin.

The challenge: A new material monitoring system

Sean Minogue, a structural engineer in Sea Ray’s product development and engineering group, came aboard in 2012, charged with updating many of the shop floor processes at Brunswick’s multiple boat-building facilities, all focused on cost and weight savings and on allowing them to build boats to higher tolerances. The previous methods used to monitor consumption of fiberglass and resin were something less than ideal. For example, tracking fiberglass consumption required monitoring the revolutions of a wheel around which the fiberglass filaments were wound; resin consumption was calculated based on the output of a stroke counter linked to a pneumatic pump. Even when both devices were operational, they tended to be inefficient and not particularly exact.  

In his proposal for a new system, Minogue explained, “The system will track resin, chop, and other bulk material usage by part. This gives us the much needed visibility of our work in progress by comparing usage to requirement data in real-time. The system is expandable to track pull weight data, SKUs, labor hours, cure cycles, takt time (average time between the start of production of one unit and the start of production of the next one), historical weight data, and most of all, provides live target data to the operators.”

The heart of the new material monitoring system: The modular measuring amplifier system PMX

Today, Sea Ray’s new MMS, now in the last stages of a year-long beta test on the yacht production line, dispenses with the wheel and stroke counter. Instead, Minogue has linked a PMX signal conditioning system (Figure 1) to load cells from a high accuracy scale to a pallet holding the fiberglass spools and to a flow transmitter connected to a flow meter that controls the amount of resin that goes to each of two chopper guns. A lamination monitor (Figure 2), a custom-built Power over Ethernet system with connected Honeywell barcode scanners, provides constant progress updates to chop spray operators. Each operator simply scans the barcode associated with each section of the hull, which appears on the screen of the lamination monitor. As the operator pulls the trigger on the chopper gun, the lamination monitor displays the material usage and compares it to the specified amount in real-time.

The lamination monitoring system, custom developed by DragonPoint Software, Inc., provides status updates on job progress to managers, updates inventory, etc., as well as reporting results to the facility’s engineering and quality database (Figure 3).

A variety of factors weighed into Minogue’s decision to choose a modular signal conditioning solution as the basis for his Material Monitoring System. He originally considered using individual signal conditioners to read the signals from the analog equipment, mostly because they’re both readily available and inexpensive. However, he was particularly motivated to choose a system that could offer the flexibility to add more signal channels easily for additional equipment for measuring gel coat usage, temperature, humidity or other factors. When measuring only weight and flow signals, a single 16-channel PMX system has the capacity to run eight chopper guns. Minogue notes, “We’ve used HBM’s SoMat ruggedized mobile data acquisition equipment in our testing lab for years, so I was pretty familiar with what they could and couldn’t do. I looked at the PMX because I needed a device that was pretty advanced and had a built-in Application Programming Interface (API) that would let me build a database to read signals from all this equipment.”

Minogue’s MMS has proven itself invaluable over the course of a year of beta testing on the Sea Ray yacht line at the Merritt Island facility, helping operators reduce material costs, work more efficiently by enhancing process control and keeping the finished parts compliant with the weight specs. For the Sea Ray 590 hull, the use of this technology has resulted in a 1,000-pound savings in chopped glass and resin. Currently, the MMS is slated to roll out on production lines for Bayliner, Boston Whaler and other Sea Ray models in other Brunswick production facilities over the next two years.